Concurrent causation. It’s as international to some courts because the Rule of Perpetuities is to a first-year regulation scholar, or quantum mechanics could be to the typical Joe.

Regardless of the widespread confusion on the tactic utilized in insurance coverage claims for dealing with losses that happen from a number of perils, the Florida Supreme Courtroom appeared to have gotten it proper again in 2016 with the Sebo v. American House Assurance Firm determination,¹ which now serves as Florida’s landmark case on concurrent causation.

Sebo concerned diving into the coverage’s exclusions and its exceptions, the oh so acquainted “ensuing loss” or “ensuing loss” provisions. Though the Sebo coverage had what is known as “anti-concurrent causation” (ACC) language underneath among the exceptions—voiding an excluded peril though it was coated as a ensuing or an ensuing loss—the faulty design and workmanship exclusion within the Sebo coverage didn’t include such ACC language. This reality affirmed protection for the Plaintiff. The court docket stood on the discovering that since different exclusions of the Sebo coverage contained ACC language, however the faulty design and workmanship exclusion particularly didn’t, the plain language of the coverage didn’t preclude the Plaintiff from restoration underneath the following loss provision.

As many Florida policyholder Hurricane Ian claims start to get thrown into the litigation oven, policyholder attorneys are discovering themselves wanting into their shoppers’ topic insurance policies for ACC language earlier than submitting go well with. As if concurrent causation wasn’t an issue for some courts sufficient, a policyholder lawyer should do their due diligence in figuring out the ACC language throughout the insurance policies and figuring out if their consumer’s declare can maintain water (no pun supposed) earlier than submitting go well with.

Many carriers stick ACC language within the preamble of their insurance policies, however this language is usually discovered throughout the exclusion sections as nicely. One may think about how the existence of ACC language inside a coverage will help insurance coverage corporations reduce and even deny a policyholder’s declare for injury brought on by a catastrophic storm that brings a number of perils, resembling a hurricane.

In September 2022, Hurricane Ian made landfall on the West Coast of Florida and ranked as one of the crucial devastating hurricanes ever to hit the state. Ian, ranked as a class 5 storm, introduced over 150 mph winds and over 12-foot storm surge in some areas.

Now, if a policyholder have been to file a declare for wind and flood injury to their property because of Hurricane Ian, wind injury may very well be coated underneath most all-risk householders insurance coverage insurance policies, but when ACC language have been inserted in the correct areas throughout the coverage excluding protection for flood injury, it may preclude the policyholder from amassing on the ensuing or ensuing loss. This has a big effect on claims dealing with as greater than 5,000 properties have been destroyed in Lee County, Florida, and practically 30,000 extra have been broken from Hurricane Ian, with a excessive variety of these brought on by storm surge.

Since 2020, over fifteen insurance coverage corporations have gone into receivership, and since then, carriers have been narrowing their insurance policies much more. ACC clauses are being discovered all through insurance policies now greater than ever. Whereas concurrent causation might have favored many policyholders prior to now, the modern-day ACC clauses have come to the rescue for insurers as we transfer into the longer term.

______________________

¹ Sebo v. American House Assurance Co., 208 So. 3d 694 (Fla. 2016).