Reesha Ahmed was on cloud 9.

It was January and Ahmed was at an OB-GYN’s workplace close to her residence in Venus, Texas, for her first prenatal checkup. After an ultrasound, getting anti-nausea treatment, and discussing her being pregnant care plan, she mentioned, a nurse made a handy suggestion: Head to the lab simply down the corridor for the standard panel of assessments.

The lab was inside Texas Well being Hospital Mansfield, which opened in December 2020 in a Dallas-Fort Value suburb. Ahmed, simply eight weeks pregnant, mentioned the physician advised her all the pieces in regards to the go to was routine. “Nothing actually stood out,” Ahmed mentioned. “And, in fact, there’s simply quite a lot of pleasure, and so I actually didn’t assume twice about something.”

Her blood assessments checked for a number of sexually transmitted infections, her blood kind, and numerous hormones. Inside days, Ahmed started bleeding and her pleasure turned to concern. A repeat ultrasound in early February confirmed no fetus.

“My coronary heart form of fell aside at that second as a result of I knew precisely what that meant,” she mentioned. She would have a miscarriage.

Then the payments got here.

The Affected person: Reesha Ahmed, 32, has an Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Defend coverage by means of her employer.

Medical Companies: An evaluation of Pap smear outcomes and a number of other blood assessments in tandem with Ahmed’s preliminary prenatal go to, together with full blood depend, blood kind, and testing for STIs similar to hepatitis B, syphilis, and HIV.

Service Supplier: Ahmed received her assessments at Texas Well being Mansfield, a tax-exempt hospital collectively operated by Texas Well being Sources, a faith-based nonprofit well being system, and AdventHealth, one other spiritual nonprofit.

Whole Invoice: The hospital charged $9,520.02 for the blood assessments and pathology companies. The insurer negotiated that all the way down to $6,700.50 after which paid $4,310.38, leaving Ahmed with a lab invoice of $2,390.12.

What Offers: Ahmed’s scenario reveals how hospital-based labs typically cost excessive costs for assessments. Even when suppliers are in community, a affected person may be on the hook for hundreds of {dollars} for frequent blood assessments which might be far cheaper in different settings. Analysis exhibits hospitals usually cost rather more than physicians’ workplaces or unbiased business labs for a similar assessments.

The scenario was notably tough for Ahmed as a result of she had misplaced the being pregnant.

“To come back to phrases with it mentally, emotionally, bodily — coping with the ramifications of the miscarriage — after which having to muster up the preventing energy to then begin calling your insurance coverage, and the billing division, the supplier’s workplace, making an attempt to struggle again a invoice that you simply don’t really feel such as you had been accurately despatched? It’s simply, it’s loads,” she mentioned.

In Texas, the identical lab assessments had been no less than six occasions as costly in a hospital as in a physician’s workplace, in keeping with analysis from the Well being Care Value Institute, a nonprofit that examines well being spending.

The markup may be even greater relying on the check. HCCI information, based mostly on 2019 costs, exhibits the median worth for an entire blood depend in Texas was $6.34 at an unbiased lab and $58.22 at a hospital. Texas Well being charged Ahmed $206.69 for that check alone.

“It’s handy to get your lab finished proper in the identical constructing,” mentioned Jessica Chang, a senior researcher at HCCI, however “many sufferers will not be enthusiastic about how extremely marked up these lab assessments are.” Chang mentioned she suspects many hospitals tack on their overhead prices once they invoice insurance coverage.

Anthem additionally charged Ahmed for no less than 4 assessments that the majority insurance coverage would take into account preventive care and subsequently lined for free of charge to sufferers below the Inexpensive Care Act’s necessities for masking preventive care, which incorporates features of prenatal care. Her EOBs, or “rationalization of advantages” notices, present she paid out-of-pocket for a check figuring out her Rh issue — which detects a protein on the floor of purple blood cells — in addition to for assessments for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and syphilis.

Requested to evaluate Ahmed’s assessments, Anthem spokesperson Emily Snooks wrote in an e-mail to KFF Well being Information that the claims “had been submitted as diagnostic — not preventive — and had been paid in keeping with the advantages within the member’s well being plan.”

There “undoubtedly shouldn’t be” out-of-pocket prices for these screenings, mentioned Sabrina Corlette, co-director of Georgetown College’s Middle on Well being Insurance coverage Reforms.

The Facilities for Illness Management and Prevention recommends screening pregnant sufferers for a number of infectious ailments that pose main dangers throughout being pregnant. Ina Park, a professor of household neighborhood medication on the College of California-San Francisco and an professional on STIs, mentioned the assessments Ahmed obtained didn’t increase purple flags from a medical perspective. “It’s actually extra what the precise lab charged based mostly on what the assessments really price,” Park mentioned. “This can be a actually exorbitant worth.”

For instance, Ahmed paid $71.86 in coinsurance for a hepatitis B check for which the hospital charged $418.55. The hospital charged $295.52 to display screen for syphilis; her out-of-pocket price was $50.74.

“You simply marvel, is the insurance coverage firm actually negotiating with this supplier as aggressively as they need to to maintain the reimbursement to an affordable quantity?” Corlette mentioned.

The Decision: Ahmed refused to pay the payments and Texas Well being despatched the debt to collections. When she tried to get solutions in regards to the prices, she mentioned she was bounced between the physician’s workplace and the hospital billing division. Ahmed submitted a grievance to the Texas lawyer normal’s workplace, which handed it to the Texas Well being and Human Companies Fee. She by no means heard again.

In response to Ahmed, a hospital consultant prompt her bloodwork may need been coded incorrectly and agreed the costs “had been actually unusually excessive,” Ahmed mentioned, however she was advised there was nothing the hospital might do to alter it. The hospital didn’t touch upon the explanation behind the excessive cost. And in a March 7 e-mail, an AdventHealth worker advised Ahmed the physician’s workplace had “no management” over the hospital’s billing.

Ahmed filed an enchantment with Anthem, nevertheless it was denied. The insurance coverage firm acknowledged the claims had been processed accurately below her advantages, which cowl 80% of what the insurer agrees to pay for in-network lab companies after she meets her deductible. Ahmed has a $1,400 deductible and a $4,600 out-of-pocket most for in-network suppliers.

“We rely on well being care suppliers to submit correct billing data concerning what medical care was wanted and delivered,” Snooks mentioned. Requested about reimbursements to the Texas Well being lab, she added, “The declare was reimbursed based mostly on the laboratory’s contract with the well being plan.”

After a KFF Well being Information reporter contacted Texas Well being on Oct. 9, the hospital referred to as Ahmed on Oct. 10 and mentioned it could zero out her payments and take away the costs from collections. Ahmed was relieved, “like an enormous burden’s simply been lifted off my shoulders.”

“It’s simply been preventing this for 10 months now, and it’s lastly gone,” she mentioned.

Texas Well being Sources and AdventHealth declined to reply to detailed questions on Ahmed’s fees and the assessments she was directed to acquire.

“We’re sorry Ms. Ahmed didn’t get readability on her care with us. Our prime precedence is to offer our sufferers with secure, efficient and medically applicable care,” Laura Shea, a spokesperson for the hospital, mentioned in an emailed assertion.

The Takeaway: Ahmed’s downside demonstrates the pitfalls of utilizing a hospital lab for routine testing.

For normal bloodwork “it’s actually laborious to argue that there’s a top quality distinction” between unbiased labs and hospitals that may warrant greater costs, Chang mentioned. That holds true for different companies, too, like imaging. “There’s nothing particular in regards to the machines that hospitals use for a CT or MRI scan. It’s the identical machine.”

Broadly, state and federal lawmakers are being attentive to this challenge. Congress is contemplating laws that may equalize funds for sure companies no matter whether or not they’re offered in a hospital outpatient division or a physician’s workplace, though not lab companies. Hospitals have tried to fend off such a coverage, generally known as “site-neutral funds.”

For instance, the Decrease Prices, Extra Transparency Act would require the identical costs below Medicare for physician-administered medication no matter whether or not they’re given in a physician’s workplace or an off-campus hospital outpatient division. That invoice additionally would require labs to make public the costs they cost Medicare for assessments. One other invoice, the Bipartisan Main Care and Well being Workforce Act, would ban hospitals from charging business well being plans some facility charges — which they use to cowl working or administrative bills.

In response to the Nationwide Convention of State Legislatures, Colorado, Connecticut, Ohio, New York, and Texas have restricted suppliers’ capacity to cost privately insured sufferers facility charges for sure companies. Colorado, Connecticut, Maryland, and New York require well being amenities to reveal facility charges to sufferers earlier than offering care; Florida instituted comparable necessities for free-standing emergency departments.

Sufferers ought to preserve copies of itemized payments and insurance coverage statements. Whereas not the one proof, these paperwork may also help sufferers keep away from out-of-pocket prices for beneficial preventive screenings.

For now, sufferers can proactively keep away from such excessive payments: When your physician says you want blood assessments, ask that the requisition be despatched to a business lab like Labcorp or Quest Diagnostics that’s in your community and have the assessments finished there. If they’ll’t do it electronically, ask for a paper requisition.

“Don’t at all times simply go to the lab that your physician recommends to you,” Corlette mentioned.

Stephanie O’Neill reported the audio story.

Invoice of the Month is a crowdsourced investigation by KFF Well being Information and NPR that dissects and explains medical payments. Do you’ve an attention-grabbing medical invoice you wish to share with us? Inform us about it!